Reaction To Press Release
Announcing Endorsement
of Voyager Visibility Project


April 20, 1996

I don't know how you came across my email address but -- sign me on to your petition. And sign me as a happily married heterosexual mother of one who believes that television desperately needs positive gay role models.

I stumbled across Star Trek when I was twelve and was one of the original 100,000 who wrote NBC and begged them to renew the series. Having been raised in a small midwestern town, I credit Star Trek for opening my mind to new ideas and attitudes There's no question that Gene Roddenberry would have sanctioned CONTINUING gay characters. It's totally in keeping with the spirit of Star Trek.

Heavens, 300 years from now the relationship debate will have moved far beyond the gay vs. heterosexual controversy. At this point Star Trek is moving backwards in its vision; it's Retro-Trek. Berman needs to get with the program.

Sincerely,
Mary Feller
San Rafael, CA


April 21, 1996

Dear Outspeaker,

First, to set the baseline for this message, I would like to mention that I am a heterosexual male.

I have been a Trekkie for as long as I can remember. I have attended the odd convention, downloaded the occasional FAQ, as well as an infrequent cheese-cake shot of Trek actresses, but in my heart I have always seen Trek as the universal equalizer. At its very foundation and conception Trek was designed to be a show to teach racial tolerance, even of the Extraterrestrial variety. Gene used his show to hold a mirror up to the turbulent sixties and give people a healthy dose of common sense.

But Star Trek was always under imminent threat of cancelation, and while logically in his pursuit of racial equality he no doubt wanted to include a gay character, he probably knew he could never get it past the NBC censors. But in Trek's second incarnation Gene had created a world where Mankind had come to the point of being a family, brother and sister, leaving all of the conflict to come from outside of their society. Factually, this would leave a *perfect* environment in which to introduce a gay character. Gene himself said towards the end of the second season that he intended to introduce a gay character (rumor had it to be a she) to complete the racial equality of Trek. But before he could implement it, he passed away. Berman (who has a bust of Gene on his desk with a blindfold tied around it. Hint. Hint.) went half way and had that episode with an androgynous society where leaning towards ANY gender save neuter was considered deviant. While this episode was done in the classic Trek style of hidden messagery, it didn't wrestle with the issue sufficiently to satisfy my societal concerns. I wish you luck on your plight, that you will be able get a gay character into Trek and complete the mission its creator assigned to it so many years ago. Adeiu.

Anthony Tecce